Monthly or weekly PVP ranking

Discussion in 'General Archive' started by YellowHammer, Aug 15, 2016.

Dear forum reader,

if you’d like to actively participate on the forum by joining discussions or starting your own threads or topics, please log into the game first. If you do not have a game account, you will need to register for one. We look forward to your next visit! CLICK HERE
?

Should the pvp system be changed?

  1. YES, change it to these suggestions

  2. Yes, change the system a different way (and l listed below how PS can do this).

  3. Nope, don't want to upset anyone....wah...wah....wah

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. There should be a REAL ranking that is CURRENT as in so far this month or this week.

    Two Lists:
    1) How may player versus player encounters

    2) List for average damage done to other players.

    The second list will favor high level players, the first list favors no one--even a noob who is playing the game often and engaging other players makes rank in that list.

    POST it in War Master.

    And please, do not continue to give advantage to devastators and piranhas to high ranked players--that was a loophole that was intended for newbies to use these ships and not get hit so much for skulls.

    In any game I've ever played, damage dealt and number of encounters are the only two ways anyone ever figures player ranking---and they are reset monthly.
     
  2. ANIKHTE

    ANIKHTE User

    pvp needs to reset every month or 2
    so everyone can actually have a chance to be infamous
    may keep an all time ranking for the fun of it but
    for the ranking it should be reset
    maybe for not making too much change in the mechanics of the game
    we can use the monthly pvp points earned to assign the ranking of the pvp player
    while we will have the all time overall just to have it

    this way the top 100 , top 10 and top1 will be open for all

    and it will be for people playing the game not for ghost that have stooped years ago

    many times is suggested pvp need to change
    but but but ...
     
    DemonLord likes this.
  3. I played a multiuser wargame that posted the numbers in two lists:

    1) Amount of damage dealt in an *attack* of a fortress

    2) Amount of damage dealt in a *defense* of a fortress

    Those were called leader boards and with all of the egos playing the game, no prizes were necessary. The stats were reset each month.
    Even a lower level player could make those lists if they played often.

    I still think two Leader Boards, one for number of player versus player encounters and the other list for amount of damage dealt allows both new players and level 50s opportunity to make at least one list.
     
    PaganHorde likes this.
  4. For the above two "Leader Boards", include ships and fortresses both:

    1) Attack damage done (other ships or fortresses)

    2) Defense damage done (your defense of your own ship and/or guild fortress).

    Not only individuals get acknowledged, but, guilds with the most successful attack damage as well as the best defense are recognized--and each guild member gets a bonus of special ammo and/or the ability to buy better ammo until the game resets monthly.
     
  5. i am happy with the way it is now - your suggestions do not , for me, improve the game
     
  6. ANIKHTE

    ANIKHTE User

    so i imagine you are a member of top 100 and you know it is hard to impossible to be kicked out
    so why to change something and then you will actual have to play and compete to stay in that position??
    because it works for 100 people most fun it is that the majority of top 100 is not even playing the game any more
    it does not mean to works for the majority of the players

    so either we have a game for 120 lucky players that started the game long time ago
    or we can have a game that can accommodate thousands of players

    this stupid hard limits in the game made the game with no players
    tell me when a new player start the game
    and see the situation as is now in the game, do you blame him for stopping??

    arena??? not for him
    battlegrounds??/ to win coins in some is a dram so no for him
    try for pvp rank?? it will take years if all the top100 stop playing

    so the game does not work plain and simple
    and thats why it run out of players
    it killed any interest for the new players
    and the old players also lost interest
    for the same reasons

    so bigpoitn all this years favored the few over the many
    and that leads the game to a steady decline
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.